A Study on the Underperformance of Civil Law in the University Rankings and Research Databases

Abstract

This study focuses on the position of civil law research in the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus scientific databases. Two of the most reputable university rankings, the Shanghai Ranking of World Universities (Shanghai University Rankings) and the Times Higher Education rankings, evaluate the quality of research on the law subject matter directly based on its position in the WoS and Scopus, respectively. This study shows that there are only 13 civil law journals in WoS, while the situation is only slightly better in Scopus. That is why the civil law colleges are ranked much lower in the Shanghai rankings and still very low in the Times Higher Education rankings. This study, in particular, indicates that there are a low number of civil law journals published in languages other than English. Thereby, the most important civil law journals are excluded from the evaluation, and the rankings of civil law colleges are not accurate. The study further focuses on the number of journals included in the WoS and Scopus in a specific area of civil and commercial law. It shows that several core legal areas of civil and commercial law either are not covered at all in WoS and Scopus or are available in very few journals that publish legal research only in the English language. It further reveals that very few languages other than English are represented in WoS and Scopus in the civil law area, and some important civil law nations are not represented by a single law journal publishing in their official languages. This research aims to provide suggestions for university rankings and academic databases on how to evaluate civil law research more appropriately.

Keywords

• civil law
• university rankings
• research databases
• impact factor
• Scopus
• Web of Science