BMC Emergency Medicine (Oct 2024)

Measuring the crowding of emergency departments: an assessment of the NEDOCS in Lombardy, Italy, and the development of a new objective indicator based on the waiting time for the first clinical assessment

  • Fabiola Signorini,
  • Giovanni Nattino,
  • Carlotta Rossi,
  • Walter Ageno,
  • Felice Catania,
  • Francesca Cortellaro,
  • Giorgio Costantino,
  • Andrea Duca,
  • Giulia Irene Ghilardi,
  • Stefano Paglia,
  • Paolo Pausilli,
  • Cristiano Perani,
  • Giuseppe Sechi,
  • Guido Bertolini

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01112-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background There is no ubiquitous definition of Emergency Department (ED) crowding and several indicators have been proposed to measure it. The National ED Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS) score is among the most popular, even though it has been severely criticised. We used the waiting time for the physician’s initial assessment to evaluate the performance of the NEDOCS and proposed a new crowding indicator based on this objective measure. Methods To evaluate the NEDOCS, we used the 2022 data of all the Lombardy EDs and compared the distribution of waiting times across the five levels of the NEDOCS at ED arrival. To construct the new indicator, we estimated the centre-specific relationship between the total number of ED patients and the waiting time of those with minor or deferrable urgency. We defined seven classes of waiting times and calculated how many patients corresponded to an average waiting time in the classes. These centre-specific cutoffs were used to define the 7-level crowding indicator. The indicator was then compared to the NEDOCS score and validated on the first six months of 2023 data. Results Patients’ waiting time did not increase at the increase of the NEDOCS score, suggesting the absence of a relationship between this score and the effect of ED crowding on the ED capacity of evaluating new patients. The indicator we propose is easy to estimate in real-time and based on centre-specific cutoffs, which depend on the volume of yearly accesses. We observed minimal agreement between the proposed indicator and the NEDOCS in most EDs, both in the development and validation datasets. Conclusions We proposed to quantify ED crowding using the waiting time for physician’s initial assessment of patients with minor or deferrable urgency, which increases in crowding situations due to the prioritization of urgent patients. The centre-specific cutoffs avoid the problem of the heterogeneity of the volume of accesses and organization among EDs, while enabling a fair comparison between centres.

Keywords