Clinical Dermatology Review (Oct 2024)
Concordance between Clinical and Histopathological Diagnosis among Various Dermatoses in the Elderly: A 5-year Retrospective Cross-sectional Assessment from a Tertiary Care Center in Southern India
Abstract
Background: Dermatoses in the elderly differ from those in the younger age group due to additional effects of intrinsic and extrinsic aging, increased prevalence of comorbidities, effects of polypharmacy, socioeconomic factors, and geographical factors. Various prevalence studies on the dermatoses in geriatric age group are available from the Indian subcontinent. Studies focusing on the agreement between their clinical and histopathological diagnosis, however, are scarce. Aims and Objectives: The study aimed at categorizing and describing the various dermatoses in the geriatric population subjected to biopsy and to determine the level of agreement between the clinical diagnosis made and the histopathological diagnosis offered in them. Materials and Methodology: Histopathological records of skin biopsies performed in patients belonging to the age group of ≥60 years in the past 5 years were analyzed. Demographic characteristics, clinical diagnosis made or the differential diagnoses considered, and histopathological diagnosis offered in each case were noted. The various dermatoses among the patients in whom a histopathological diagnosis was offered were categorized into inflammatory (infections and noninfectious dermatoses), neoplastic, and other dermatoses groups. The level of agreement between clinical and histopathological diagnosis was described as complete agreement, partial agreement, and disagreement. Statistical significance was assessed using the Chi-square test, and the strength of association was assessed using kappa statistics. Results: A total of 109 biopsies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The mean age of the study population was 67.02 ± 6.624 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.6:1. Majority of the dermatoses belonged to the noninfectious inflammatory group (52 [47.70%]) followed by neoplasms (28 [25.68%]). Overall, complete agreement between the clinical diagnosis made or one of the differential diagnoses considered and the histopathological diagnosis offered was seen in 91 of 109 cases (83.5%), which was statistically significant (P = 0.0001). A higher level of complete agreement was noted among the inflammatory dermatoses (67 of 79 cases [84.81%]) when compared to neoplastic dermatoses (22 of 28 cases [78.57%]). Among the inflammatory dermatoses, complete agreement was more for the noninfectious (46 [88.46%]) than the infectious (21 [77.78%]) dermatoses. All the cases (2) belonging to the other group of dermatoses showed complete agreement. Disagreement was highest among the neoplasms (6 [21.43%]), followed by the noninfectious inflammatory dermatoses (5 [9.62%]). Partial agreement with the clinical diagnosis was maximum for the infectious diseases (5 [18.51%]). Conclusion: This study noted a statistically significant high rate of concordance (Chi-square test –P = 0.0001) between the clinical and histopathological diagnosis among the dermatoses in the geriatric population when taken together as well as among individual categories. Noninfectious inflammatory dermatoses constituted the major group with the highest and statistically significant concordance between the clinical and histopathological diagnosis. Furthermore, there was almost perfect strength of association (kappa statistics –P = 0.000) noted among the individual categories of dermatoses.
Keywords
