Diabetes & Metabolism Journal (Nov 2024)

Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Review and Position Statement of the Fatty Liver Research Group of the Korean Diabetes Association

  • Jaehyun Bae,
  • Eugene Han,
  • Hye Won Lee,
  • Cheol-Young Park,
  • Choon Hee Chung,
  • Dae Ho Lee,
  • Eun-Hee Cho,
  • Eun-Jung Rhee,
  • Ji Hee Yu,
  • Ji Hyun Park,
  • Ji-Cheol Bae,
  • Jung Hwan Park,
  • Kyung Mook Choi,
  • Kyung-Soo Kim,
  • Mi Hae Seo,
  • Minyoung Lee,
  • Nan-Hee Kim,
  • So Hun Kim,
  • Won-Young Lee,
  • Woo Je Lee,
  • Yeon-Kyung Choi,
  • Yong-ho Lee,
  • You-Cheol Hwang,
  • Young Sang Lyu,
  • Byung-Wan Lee,
  • Bong-Soo Cha,
  • on Behalf of the Fatty Liver Research Group of the Korean Diabetes Association

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2024.0541
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 48, no. 6
pp. 1015 – 1028

Abstract

Read online

Since the role of the liver in metabolic dysfunction, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, was demonstrated, studies on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) have shown associations between fatty liver disease and other metabolic diseases. Unlike the exclusionary diagnostic criteria of NAFLD, MAFLD diagnosis is based on the presence of metabolic dysregulation in fatty liver disease. Renaming NAFLD as MAFLD also introduced simpler diagnostic criteria. In 2023, a new nomenclature, steatotic liver disease (SLD), was proposed. Similar to MAFLD, SLD diagnosis is based on the presence of hepatic steatosis with at least one cardiometabolic dysfunction. SLD is categorized into metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-related/-associated liver disease, alcoholrelated liver disease, specific etiology SLD, and cryptogenic SLD. The term MASLD has been adopted by a number of leading national and international societies due to its concise diagnostic criteria, exclusion of other concomitant liver diseases, and lack of stigmatizing terms. This article reviews the diagnostic criteria, clinical relevance, and differences among NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD from a diabetologist’s perspective and provides a rationale for adopting SLD/MASLD in the Fatty Liver Research Group of the Korean Diabetes Association.

Keywords