PLoS ONE (Jan 2019)

Association of Adductor Pollicis Muscle Thickness and Handgrip Strength with nutritional status in cancer patients.

  • Katarina Papera Valente,
  • Betullya Lucas Almeida,
  • Thailiny Ricati Lazzarini,
  • Vanusa Felício de Souza,
  • Thamirys de Souza Chaves Ribeiro,
  • Rafael Araújo Guedes de Moraes,
  • Taísa Sabrina Silva Pereira,
  • Valdete Regina Guandalini

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220334
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 8
p. e0220334

Abstract

Read online

Background and aimMalnutrition is common in patients with cancer, and its early diagnosis can reduce or prevent further complications and improve the clinical and nutritional prognosis. Adductor Pollicis Muscle Thickness (APMT) and Handgrip Strength have been explored in this population to identify a reduction in strength and muscle mass prior to the use of conventional methods. We aimed to correlate APMT and Handgrip Strength with conventional anthropometric variables in cancer patients and verify their association with nutritional status as determined by the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA).MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with 80 patients diagnosed with cancer who were candidates for surgery. Nutritional status was obtained from the PG-SGA. Conventional anthropometric measurements were taken, as well as APMT and Handgrip Strength. Pearson's correlation analysis and multivariate linear regression were applied to detect the influence of variables on APMT and HGS. A significance level of 5.0% was considered.ResultsA high prevalence of malnutrition and the need for dietotherapic intervention was found, identified by the PG-SGA. Correlations between APMT and Handgrip Strength with anthropometric variables and with the PG-SGA score were observed. After regression adjustments, the variables that interacted with APMT were TSF and AC, and the PG-SGA score, corrected Muscle Arm Area (CAMA), and age interacted with Handgrip Strength.ConclusionCorrelations between anthropometric measurements and the PG-SGA score with APMT and Handgrip Strength were observed, even after adjusting for age and sex. These associations demonstrate that APMT and Handgrip Strength can be used with criterion in patients with cancer as complementary methods to evaluate nutritional risk and the need for nutritional intervention.