Outcomes of short- versus long-acting gas tamponades in vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Abstract

Abstract Background In vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, long-acting gas tamponades (LGT) such as C3F8 or C2F6 may improve surgical success rate due to their prolonged effect compared to a short-acting gas tamponade (SGT) with SF6. On the other hand, SGT allow a significantly faster visual rehabilitation after surgery and may reduce the risk of gas-related complications. As comparative data in retinal detachment surgery is limited, we assessed the outcomes of vitrectomies using either LGT or SGT. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 533 eyes of 524 consecutive patients diagnosed with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment not complicated by proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) and treated by vitrectomy at two clinical sites. Depending on the site the patients presented at, they received either preferentially LGT (study site 1) or SGT (study site 2). Retinal re-detachment rates during a period of 6 months following surgery were analyzed. Results At study site 1, 254 of 278 eyes (91.4%) were treated by LGT (C3F8 72.3%; C2F6 19.1%), whereas at study site 2, 246 of 255 eyes (96.5%) received SGT (SF6). Rates of retinal re-detachment in the LGT- and SGT-treated groups were similar with 23 of 254 eyes (9.1%) and 24 of 246 eyes (9.8%), respectively (p = 0.9). Median time to re-detachment was 5.7 weeks in the LGT-treated group and 4.4 weeks in the SGT-treated group (p = 0.4). Conclusion In rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair by vitrectomy, the use of SGT results in comparable rates of successful retinal re-attachment as LGT. Given the faster visual rehabilitation with SGT, these results suggest SGT as a sensible alternative to LGT in surgery of retinal detachment without PVR.

Keywords

• Gas tamponade
• Vitrectomy
• Retinal detachment
• Surgery
• Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)
• Hexafluoroethane (C2F6)