eLife (May 2022)

Development and evaluation of a machine learning-based in-hospital COVID-19 disease outcome predictor (CODOP): A multicontinental retrospective study

  • Riku Klén,
  • Disha Purohit,
  • Ricardo Gómez-Huelgas,
  • José Manuel Casas-Rojo,
  • Juan Miguel Antón-Santos,
  • Jesús Millán Núñez-Cortés,
  • Carlos Lumbreras,
  • José Manuel Ramos-Rincón,
  • Noelia García Barrio,
  • Miguel Pedrera-Jiménez,
  • Antonio Lalueza Blanco,
  • María Dolores Martin-Escalante,
  • Francisco Rivas-Ruiz,
  • Maria Ángeles Onieva-García,
  • Pablo Young,
  • Juan Ignacio Ramirez,
  • Estela Edith Titto Omonte,
  • Rosmery Gross Artega,
  • Magdy Teresa Canales Beltrán,
  • Pascual Ruben Valdez,
  • Florencia Pugliese,
  • Rosa Castagna,
  • Ivan A Huespe,
  • Bruno Boietti,
  • Javier A Pollan,
  • Nico Funke,
  • Benjamin Leiding,
  • David Gómez-Varela

DOI
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75985
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

New SARS-CoV-2 variants, breakthrough infections, waning immunity, and sub-optimal vaccination rates account for surges of hospitalizations and deaths. There is an urgent need for clinically valuable and generalizable triage tools assisting the allocation of hospital resources, particularly in resource-limited countries. We developed and validate CODOP, a machine learning-based tool for predicting the clinical outcome of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. CODOP was trained, tested and validated with six cohorts encompassing 29223 COVID-19 patients from more than 150 hospitals in Spain, the USA and Latin America during 2020–22. CODOP uses 12 clinical parameters commonly measured at hospital admission for reaching high discriminative ability up to 9 days before clinical resolution (AUROC: 0·90–0·96), it is well calibrated, and it enables an effective dynamic risk stratification during hospitalization. Furthermore, CODOP maintains its predictive ability independently of the virus variant and the vaccination status. To reckon with the fluctuating pressure levels in hospitals during the pandemic, we offer two online CODOP calculators, suited for undertriage or overtriage scenarios, validated with a cohort of patients from 42 hospitals in three Latin American countries (78–100% sensitivity and 89–97% specificity). The performance of CODOP in heterogeneous and geographically disperse patient cohorts and the easiness of use strongly suggest its clinical utility, particularly in resource-limited countries.

Keywords