Animals (May 2023)

Eleven Years of Health Monitoring in Wild Boars (<i>Sus scrofa</i>) in the Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy)

  • Arianna Rossi,
  • Annalisa Santi,
  • Filippo Barsi,
  • Gabriele Casadei,
  • Alessandra Di Donato,
  • Maria Cristina Fontana,
  • Giorgio Galletti,
  • Chiara Anna Garbarino,
  • Annalisa Lombardini,
  • Carmela Musto,
  • Alice Prosperi,
  • Giovanni Pupillo,
  • Gianluca Rugna,
  • Marco Tamba

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13111832
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 11
p. 1832

Abstract

Read online

In recent years, the growth of wild ungulates has increased the focus on their health monitoring. In particular, the health status of wild boars is relevant for the economic impact on the pig industry. The Emilia-Romagna region activated a wildlife monitoring plan to better evaluate the health status of the wild boar population. Between 2011 and 2021, samples of found dead and hunted wild boar have been examined for trichinellosis, tuberculosis, brucellosis, african swine fever, classical swine fever, Aujeszky’s disease, swine vesicular disease, and swine influenza A. Trichinella britovi was identified in 0.001% of the examined wild boars; neither M. bovis nor M. tuberculosis were found in M. tuberculosis complex positive samples; 2.3% were positive for Brucella suis; 29.4% of the sera were positive for Aujeszky’s disease virus; and 0.9% of the samples were positive for swine influenza A virus. With an uncertain population estimate, the number of animals tested, the number of positives, and the sampling method do not allow us to make many inferences but suggest the need to implement and strengthen the existing surveillance activity, as it seems to be the only viable alternative for safeguarding animal and human health.

Keywords