Common elements of service delivery models that optimise quality of life and health service use among older people with advanced progressive conditions: a tertiary systematic review
Deokhee Yi,
Sabrina Bajwah,
Matthew Maddocks,
Charles Normand,
Tatsuya Morita,
Satoru Tsuneto,
Caroline Nicholson,
Yoshiyuki Kizawa,
Pamela Turrillas,
Anna E Bone,
Catherine J Evans,
Amelia Cook,
Sarah Combes,
Joanne Bayly,
Clare Ellis-Smith,
India Tunnard,
Shuja Yaqub,
Kennedy B Nkhoma,
Shalini Ahuja,
Nanako Nishiyama,
Paul Ong
Affiliations
Deokhee Yi
Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Kings College London and King`s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Sabrina Bajwah
Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King`s College London, London, UK
Matthew Maddocks
4 Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Kings College London, London, UK
Charles Normand
Centre for Health Policy and Management, The University of Dublin Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
Tatsuya Morita
5 Palliative and Supportive Care Division, Seirei Mikatahara Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
Satoru Tsuneto
Department of Human Health Sciences, Department of Palliative Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
Caroline Nicholson
National Institute for Health Research post doctoral research fellow
Yoshiyuki Kizawa
Department of Palliative Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
Pamela Turrillas
Superintendency of Pensions, Ministry of Labor and Social Security, Santiago, Chile
Anna E Bone
Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King`s College London, London, UK
Catherine J Evans
Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King`s College London, London, UK
Amelia Cook
Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King`s College London, London, UK
Sarah Combes
Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, King`s College London, London, UK
Joanne Bayly
Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King`s College London, London, UK
Clare Ellis-Smith
Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King`s College London, London, UK
India Tunnard
Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King`s College London, London, UK
Shuja Yaqub
Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King`s College London, London, UK
Kennedy B Nkhoma
Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, King`s College London, London, UK
Shalini Ahuja
Methodologies Research Division, Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Pallative Care, London, UK
Nanako Nishiyama
Graduate School of Comprehensive Rehabilitation, Osaka Prefecture University, Habikino, Japan
Paul Ong
WHO Centre for Health Development (WKC), Kobe, Japan
Introduction Health and social care services worldwide need to support ageing populations to live well with advanced progressive conditions while adapting to functional decline and finitude. We aimed to identify and map common elements of effective geriatric and palliative care services and consider their scalability and generalisability to high, middle and low-income countries.Methods Tertiary systematic review (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, Embase, January 2000–October 2019) of studies in geriatric or palliative care that demonstrated improved quality of life and/or health service use outcomes among older people with advanced progressive conditions. Using frameworks for health system analysis, service elements were identified. We used a staged, iterative process to develop a ‘common components’ logic model and consulted experts in geriatric or palliative care from high, middle and low-income countries on its scalability.Results 78 studies (59 geriatric and 19 palliative) spanning all WHO regions were included. Data were available from 17 739 participants. Nearly half the studies recruited patients with heart failure (n=36) and one-third recruited patients with mixed diagnoses (n=26). Common service elements (≥80% of studies) included collaborative working, ongoing assessment, active patient participation, patient/family education and patient self-management. Effective services incorporated patient engagement, patient goal-driven care and the centrality of patient needs. Stakeholders (n=20) emphasised that wider implementation of such services would require access to skilled, multidisciplinary teams with sufficient resource to meet patients’ needs. Identified barriers to scalability included the political and societal will to invest in and prioritise palliative and geriatric care for older people, alongside geographical and socioeconomic factors.Conclusion Our logic model combines elements of effective services to achieve optimal quality of life and health service use among older people with advanced progressive conditions. The model transcends current best practice in geriatric and palliative care and applies across the care continuum, from prevention of functional decline to end-of-life care.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020150252.