Scientific Reports (Mar 2024)

A retrospective cohort study of autogenous iliac strut bone grafting in large bone defects of the lower extremity

  • Incheol Kook,
  • Jooyoung You,
  • Dong Hong Kim,
  • Ki-Chul Park,
  • Kyu Tae Hwang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56726-7
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Autogenous iliac bone graft (AIBG) is the treatment of choice for managing bone defects, and favorable results have been reported for bone defects < 5 cm in length. In large bone defects ≥ 5 cm, it is difficult to obtain good results with simple bone grafting, and other management options have drawbacks, such as long immobilization periods and high complication rates. We hypothesized that AIBG in the strut form might show favorable results in large bone defects with minimal complications. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of strut-type AIBG and evaluate its effectiveness compared to cancellous AIBG. This retrospective study included 50 patients who underwent AIBG for bone defects at a single institution between March 2011 and April 2020. We performed corticocancellous AIBG in a strut form to manage bone defects ≥ 5 cm in the lower extremities. The strut bone was harvested along the iliac crest and grafted slightly longer than the bone defect to apply a sufficient compressive force. Demographic information and radiographic and clinical results of patients who underwent strut AIBG (Group S) were analyzed. The outcomes of union, time to union, complications, and reoperation were compared with those of patients who underwent cancellous AIBG (Group C). The study population comprised 37 men (74%) and 13 women (26%), with a mean age of 50.0 (range: 19–78). The average follow-up period was 25.6 months (12–104 months). Group S included 16 patients with a mean bone defect length of 6.8 ± 1.2 cm. In Group S, union was achieved in all patients, with an average time to union of 6.7 months. Complications occurred in four cases, all related to wound problems. Group C comprised d 34 patients with a mean defect length of 2.8 ± 1.1 cm. Complications occurred in five patients in Group C, including four soft tissue problems and one implant failure. When comparing the outcomes of Groups S and C, no significant differences were observed. AIBG is an effective and safe technique for managing bone defects. Strut AIBG can be used effectively for bone defects ≥ 5 cm in the lower extremities.