Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (Oct 2017)

Gender incongruence: a comparative study using ICD-10 and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria

  • Bianca M. Soll,
  • Rebeca Robles-García,
  • Angelo Brandelli-Costa,
  • Daniel Mori,
  • Andressa Mueller,
  • Anna M. Vaitses-Fontanari,
  • Dhiordan Cardoso-da-Silva,
  • Karine Schwarz,
  • Maiko Abel-Schneider,
  • Alexandre Saadeh,
  • Maria-Inês-Rodrigues Lobato

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2224
Journal volume & issue
no. 0

Abstract

Read online

Objective: To compare the presence of criteria listed in the DSM-5 and ICD-10 diagnostic manuals in a Brazilian sample of transgender persons seeking health services specifically for physical transition. Methods: This multicenter cross-sectional study included a sample of 103 subjects who sought services for gender identity disorder in two main reference centers in Brazil. The method involved a structured interview encompassing the diagnostic criteria in the two manuals. Results: The results revealed that despite theoretical disagreement about the criteria, the manuals overlap regarding diagnosis confirmation; the DSM-5 was more inclusive (97.1%) than the ICD-10 (93.2%) in this population. Conclusions: Although there is no consensus on diagnostic criteria on transgenderism in the diversity of social and cultural contexts, more comprehensive diagnostic criteria are evolving due to society’s increasing inclusivity.

Keywords