EPJ Web of Conferences (Jan 2015)

The Generalized Centroid Difference method for lifetime measurements via γ-γ coincidences using large fast-timing arrays

  • Régis J.-M.,
  • Jolie J.,
  • Mach H.,
  • Simpson G.S.,
  • Blazhev A.,
  • Pascovici G.,
  • Pfeiffer M.,
  • Rudigier M.,
  • Saed-Samii N.,
  • Warr N.,
  • Blanc A.,
  • de France G.,
  • Jentschel M.,
  • Köster U.,
  • Mutti P.,
  • Soldner T.,
  • Ur C.A.,
  • Urban W.,
  • Bruce A.M.,
  • Drouet F.,
  • Fraile L.M.,
  • Ilieva S.,
  • Korten W.,
  • Kröll T.,
  • Lalkovski S.,
  • Mărginean S.,
  • Paziy V.,
  • Podolyák Zs.,
  • Regan P.H.,
  • Stezowski O.,
  • Vancraeyenest A.

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20159301013
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 93
p. 01013

Abstract

Read online

A novel method for direct electronic “fast-timing” lifetime measurements of nuclear excited states via γ-γ coincidences using an array equipped with N very fast high-resolution LaBr3(Ce) scintillator detectors is presented. The generalized centroid difference method provides two independent “start” and “stop” time spectra obtained without any correction by a superposition of the N(N – 1)/2 calibrated γ-γ time difference spectra of the N detector fast-timing system. The two fast-timing array time spectra correspond to a forward and reverse gating of a specific γ-γ cascade and the centroid difference as the time shift between the centroids of the two time spectra provides a picosecond-sensitive mirror-symmetric observable of the set-up. The energydependent mean prompt response difference between the start and stop events is calibrated and used as a single correction for lifetime determination. These combined fast-timing array mean γ-γ zero-time responses can be determined for 40 keV < Eγ < 1.4 MeV with a precision better than 10 ps using a 152Eu γ-ray source. The new method is described with examples of (n,γ) and (n,f,γ) experiments performed at the intense cold-neutron beam facility PF1B of the Institut Laue-Langevin in Grenoble, France, using 16 LaBr3(Ce) detectors within the EXILL&FATIMA campaign in 2013. The results are discussed with respect to possible systematic errors induced by background contributions.