Dynamic NF-κB and E2F interactions control the priority and timing of inflammatory signalling and cell proliferation
John M Ankers,
Raheela Awais,
Nicholas A Jones,
James Boyd,
Sheila Ryan,
Antony D Adamson,
Claire V Harper,
Lloyd Bridge,
David G Spiller,
Dean A Jackson,
Pawel Paszek,
Violaine Sée,
Michael RH White
Affiliations
John M Ankers
Centre for Cell Imaging, Institute of Integrative Biology, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Raheela Awais
Centre for Cell Imaging, Institute of Integrative Biology, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Systems Microscopy Centre, Faculty of Life Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom
Nicholas A Jones
Systems Microscopy Centre, Faculty of Life Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom
James Boyd
Systems Microscopy Centre, Faculty of Life Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom
Sheila Ryan
Centre for Cell Imaging, Institute of Integrative Biology, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Systems Microscopy Centre, Faculty of Life Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom
Antony D Adamson
Systems Microscopy Centre, Faculty of Life Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom
Claire V Harper
Systems Microscopy Centre, Faculty of Life Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom
Lloyd Bridge
Systems Microscopy Centre, Faculty of Life Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom; Department of Mathematics, University of Swansea, Swansea, United Kingdom
David G Spiller
Systems Microscopy Centre, Faculty of Life Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom
Dynamic cellular systems reprogram gene expression to ensure appropriate cellular fate responses to specific extracellular cues. Here we demonstrate that the dynamics of Nuclear Factor kappa B (NF-κB) signalling and the cell cycle are prioritised differently depending on the timing of an inflammatory signal. Using iterative experimental and computational analyses, we show physical and functional interactions between NF-κB and the E2 Factor 1 (E2F-1) and E2 Factor 4 (E2F-4) cell cycle regulators. These interactions modulate the NF-κB response. In S-phase, the NF-κB response was delayed or repressed, while cell cycle progression was unimpeded. By contrast, activation of NF-κB at the G1/S boundary resulted in a longer cell cycle and more synchronous initial NF-κB responses between cells. These data identify new mechanisms by which the cellular response to stress is differentially controlled at different stages of the cell cycle.