Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (Feb 2024)

Time Variability Correction of CMIP6 Climate Change Projections

  • Y. Shao,
  • C. H. Bishop,
  • S. Hobeichi,
  • N. Nishant,
  • G. Abramowitz,
  • S. Sherwood

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023MS003640
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 2
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Accurate projections of climate change and associated extreme events under differing emission scenarios are linked to realistic representations of the temporal variability of the atmosphere at a variety of time scales, for example, annual, seasonal, synoptic, and daily. Here a new method is employed to explicitly quantify a model's ability to accurately represent covariance at and between differing time scales. From our global‐scale analysis, on average, raw Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) models misrepresent temporal variances at differing time scales for maximum temperature (tasmax) by a considerable margin, particularly at 183‐, 92‐ and 46‐day time scales. To ameliorate such variability errors, we propose a novel Time Variability Correction (TVC) method that corrects temporal covariances while preserving the essential time‐event sequence of the model simulations. We adopt a model‐as‐truth framework to evaluate the effectiveness of the TVC method under future forcing conditions when applied to daily tasmax simulations from 23 CMIP6 models for 1% of the global grid cells. TVC‐corrected temperatures generally show improved matching of temporal variance and lag correlations in the out‐of‐sample projection period compared to simple mean‐corrected projections. By imparting more realistic temporal‐correlations to model series, TVC is expected to improve the projections of extreme events associated with persistent heat, such as heatwaves. Applying TVC to future temperature projections using actual observations significantly increases the temperature variance in most middle to high latitude land regions in the Northern Hemisphere, while decreasing it in most low to middle latitude land regions, compared to simple mean‐corrected projections.

Keywords