Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems (Sep 2022)

Monitoring the 2021 Mw 8.2 Alaska Earthquake by an Offshore Seismic and Fluid Pressure Observation Network and Implications for Ocean‐Crust Dynamic Coupling

  • Tianhaozhe Sun,
  • Earl Davis

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GC010540
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 9
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Ground shaking caused by earthquakes is accompanied by seafloor and sub‐seafloor formation fluid pressure variations in offshore areas, but there have been few collocated observations of these signals. In this work, we report seismic and high‐sampling‐rate fluid pressure records of the 2021 Mw 8.2 Alaska earthquake by the Ocean Networks Canada (ONC) NEPTUNE observatory at an epicentral distance of ∼2,200 km in the northeast Pacific Ocean. The system comprises observatory nodes in various tectonic environments, with each node including buried broadband seismometers, seafloor pressure sensors, and, at two nodes, borehole pressure sensors. Seismic and tsunami waveforms of the Mw 8.2 earthquake were documented in detail. Seismic seafloor pressure variations (Psf) were dominated by Rayleigh waves of periods between 5 and 50 s, with peak amplitudes of 3–4 kPa at most sites. Waveform similarity and the linear scaling between Psf and vertical ground acceleration indicate forced acceleration of the water column being dominant in governing Psf during long‐period surface‐wave arrivals, with an additional component of elastic oscillation occurring at higher frequencies (>0.1 Hz) causing extra pressure signals. Analysis of formation pressure variations due to various types of ocean loading of distinctly different frequencies (e.g., tides, tsunami, and infragravity waves) shows stable one‐dimensional vertical loading efficiencies that depend on lithology at each borehole site, with loading response being strongly influenced by the presence of free gas at shallow depths within the Cascadia accretionary prism. Inter‐site comparisons of seismic and seafloor pressure waveforms demonstrate a key role of sediment thickness in the amplification of surface wave amplitudes.

Keywords