Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (Aug 2024)

Intravenous versus topical tranexamic acid in spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Bo Deng,
  • Xudong Li,
  • Peng Xie,
  • Xiaozhong Luo,
  • Xueliang Yan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04989-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) during spinal surgery has been shown to reduce blood loss. However, the efficacy and safety of intravenous TXA (ivTXA) and topical TXA (tTXA) are poorly documented. The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ivTXA and tTXA administration in spinal surgery. Methods Potentially relevant academic articles were identified from PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library, CNKI database, and Wanfang Data from the date of inception until March 1, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) were included in our meta-analysis if they compared the efficacy and safety of ivTXA versus tTXA administration during spinal surgery. Secondary sources were identified from the references of the included literature. The meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook and the PRISMA statement. Data were summarized using RevMan 5.3 software from Denmark. Results Four RCTs and one non-RCT met our inclusion criteria. The pooled outcomes demonstrated that ivTXA groups compared with tTXA groups had significantly less amount of total blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD)=-159.55, 95% CI (-181.91,-137.19), P < 0.00001], hidden blood loss [WMD=-132.27, 95% CI (-159.81, -104.72), P < 0.00001], intraoperative blood loss [WMD=-86.22, 95% CI (-99.13, -73.31), P < 0.00001, I 2 = 96%], and more high postoperative hemoglobin level [WMD = 8.96, 95% CI (5.18, 12.75), P < 0.00001, I 2 = 29%], and less transfusion rate [risk ratio (RR) = 1.11, 95% CI (0.81,1.52), P = 0.50, I 2 = 94%]. The pooled results showed no significant difference in thromboembolic events (deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) between the two groups. Conclusion Our meta-analysis demonstrated that ivTXA was more effective than tTXA in inducing hemostatic effect during spinal surgery. However, the risk of a thrombotic event was not different between the two administration methods of TXA. More high quality RCTs are needed to further confirm our conclusions.

Keywords