PLoS ONE (Jan 2022)

Multicenter validation of a machine learning phase space electro-mechanical pulse wave analysis to predict elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure at the point-of-care.

  • Sanjeev P Bhavnani,
  • Rola Khedraki,
  • Travis J Cohoon,
  • Frederick J Meine,
  • Thomas D Stuckey,
  • Thomas McMinn,
  • Jeremiah P Depta,
  • Brett Bennett,
  • Thomas McGarry,
  • William Carroll,
  • David Suh,
  • John A Steuter,
  • Michael Roberts,
  • Horace R Gillins,
  • Ian Shadforth,
  • Emmanuel Lange,
  • Abhinav Doomra,
  • Mohammad Firouzi,
  • Farhad Fathieh,
  • Timothy Burton,
  • Ali Khosousi,
  • Shyam Ramchandani,
  • William E Sanders,
  • Frank Smart

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277300
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 11
p. e0277300

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundPhase space is a mechanical systems approach and large-scale data representation of an object in 3-dimensional space. Whether such techniques can be applied to predict left ventricular pressures non-invasively and at the point-of-care is unknown.ObjectiveThis study prospectively validated a phase space machine-learned approach based on a novel electro-mechanical pulse wave method of data collection through orthogonal voltage gradient (OVG) and photoplethysmography (PPG) for the prediction of elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP).MethodsConsecutive outpatients across 15 US-based healthcare centers with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease were enrolled at the time of elective cardiac catheterization and underwent OVG and PPG data acquisition immediately prior to angiography with signals paired with LVEDP (IDENTIFY; NCT #03864081). The primary objective was to validate a ML algorithm for prediction of elevated LVEDP using a definition of ≥25 mmHg (study cohort) and normal LVEDP ≤ 12 mmHg (control cohort), using AUC as the measure of diagnostic accuracy. Secondary objectives included performance of the ML predictor in a propensity matched cohort (age and gender) and performance for an elevated LVEDP across a spectrum of comparative LVEDP (ResultsThe study cohort consisted of 684 subjects stratified into three LVEDP categories, ≤12 mmHg (N = 258), LVEDP 13-24 mmHg (N = 347), and LVEDP ≥25 mmHg (N = 79). Testing of the ML predictor demonstrated an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.76-0.86) for the prediction of an elevated LVEDP with a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 68%, respectively. Among a propensity matched cohort (N = 79) the ML predictor demonstrated a similar result AUC 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72-0.8). Using a constant definition of elevated LVEDP and varying the lower threshold across LVEDP the ML predictor demonstrated and AUC ranging from 0.79-0.82.ConclusionThe phase space ML analysis provides a robust prediction for an elevated LVEDP at the point-of-care. These data suggest a potential role for an OVG and PPG derived electro-mechanical pulse wave strategy to determine if LVEDP is elevated in patients with symptoms suggestive of cardiac disease.