Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease (May 2024)

Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Wajeeh ur Rehman,
  • Merav Yarkoni,
  • Muhammad Abdullah Ilyas,
  • Farwa Athar,
  • Mahnoor Javaid,
  • Muhammad Ehsan,
  • Muhammad Talha Khalid,
  • Ahmed Pasha,
  • Abdelhamid Ben Selma,
  • Alon Yarkoni,
  • Keyoor Patel,
  • Mouhamed Amr Sabouni,
  • Afzal ur Rehman

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11050152
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 5
p. 152

Abstract

Read online

Background: Atherosclerosis is a multi-factorial disease, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a critical risk factor in developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Cholesteryl-ester transfer-protein (CETP), synthesized by the liver, regulates LDL-C and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) through the bidirectional transfer of lipids. The novelty of CETP inhibitors (CETPis) has granted new focus towards increasing HDL-C, besides lowering LDL-C strategies. To date, five CETPis that are projected to improve lipid profiles, torcetrapib, dalcetrapib, evacetrapib, anacetrapib, and obicetrapib, have reached late-stage clinical development for ASCVD risk reduction. Early trials failed to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular occurrences. Given the advent of some recent large-scale clinical trials (ACCELERATE, HPS3/TIMI55-REVEAL Collaborative Group), conducting a meta-analysis is essential to investigate CETPis’ efficacy. Methods: We conducted a thorough search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that commenced between 2003 and 2023; CETPi versus placebo studies with a ≥6-month follow-up and defined outcomes were eligible. Primary outcomes: major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related mortality, all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes: stroke, revascularization, hospitalization due to acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction (MI). Results: Nine RCTs revealed that the use of a CETPi significantly reduced CVD-related mortality (RR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.81–0.98; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%); the same studies also reduced the risk of MI (RR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.86–0.98; p = 0.01; I2 = 0%), which was primarily attributed to anacetrapib. The use of a CETPi did not reduce the likelihood any other outcomes. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis shows, for the first time, that CETPis are associated with reduced CVD-related mortality and MI.

Keywords