Cancers (Dec 2021)

Rethinking the TNM Classification Regarding Direct Lymph Node Invasion in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

  • Fiona Speichinger,
  • Mihnea P. Dragomir,
  • Simon Schallenberg,
  • Florian N. Loch,
  • Claudius E. Degro,
  • Ann-Kathrin Baukloh,
  • Lisa Hartmann,
  • Ioannis Pozios,
  • Christian Schineis,
  • Georgios Antonios Margonis,
  • Johannes C. Lauscher,
  • Katharina Beyer,
  • Carsten Kamphues

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14010201
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
p. 201

Abstract

Read online

Mechanisms of lymph node invasion seem to play a prognostic role in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after resection. However, the 8th edition of the TNM classification of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) does not consider this. The aim of this study was to analyse the prognostic role of different mechanisms of lymph node invasion on PDAC. One hundred and twenty-two patients with resected PDAC were examined. We distinguished three groups: direct (per continuitatem, Nc) from the main tumour, metastasis (Nm) without any contact to the main tumour, and a mixed mechanism (Ncm). Afterwards, the prognostic power of the different groups was analysed concerning overall survival (OS). In total, 20 patients displayed direct lymph node invasion (Nc = 16.4%), 44 were classed as Nm (36.1%), and 21 were classed as Ncm (17.2%). The difference in OS was not statistically significant between N0 (no lymph node metastasis, n = 37) and Nc (p = 0.134), while Nm had worse OS than N0 (p 0.001). Direct invasion alone had no statistically significant effect on OS (p = 0.885). Redefining the N0 stage by including Nc patients showed a more precise OS prediction among N stages (p = 0.001 vs. p = 0.002). Nc was more similar to N0 than to Nm; hence, we suggest a rethinking of TNM classification based on the mechanisms of lymph node metastases in PDAC. Overall, this novel classification is more precise.

Keywords