Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (Feb 2010)
Sinal de Cecin (Sinal "X"): um aprimoramento no diagnóstico de compressão radicular por hérnias discais lombares Cecin’s Sign ("X" Sign): improving the diagnosis of radicular compression by herniated lumbar disks
Abstract
O autor, ao reiterar que o exame clínico continua sendo o pilar do exercício da medicina, propôs, anteriormente, uma nova manobra semiótica, o sinal "X" ou de Cecin, para aprimorar o diagnóstico da hérnia de disco lombar, e descreveu seus fundamentos biomecânicos. Entretanto, o desempenho diagnóstico dessa manobra ainda não foi formalmente avaliado. PACIENTES E MÉTODOS: A manobra semiótica - Sinal de Cecin -, que consiste na flexão da coluna lombar e na realização simultânea da manobra de Valsalva, foi aplicada em 45 pacientes com lombociatalgia típica e herniação discal correspondente confirmada pela ressonância magnética (RM), e em 21 pacientes com lombalgia mecânica comum, sem ciatalgia e com RM normal. O sinal de Lasègue foi testado concomitantemente e a discordância e concordância entre as duas manobras foram avaliadas. RESULTADOS: Foi observada uma alta discrepância (P While reaffirming that the clinical exam still is the best medical practice, the author has proposed a new maneuver (Cecin‘s sign or "X" sign) to help the diagnosis of herniated lumbar disk, describing its biomechanical bases. However, the diagnostic performance of this maneuver has not been formally tested. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The maneuver, which consists on the flexion of the lumbar spine while simultaneously performing the Valsalva maneuver, was tested in 45 patients with typical sciatic pain and herniated lumbar disk confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and in 21 patients with simple mechanical back pain with normal MRI. Lasègue’s sign was investigated concomitantly and the concordance with the "X" sign was assessed. RESULTS: Concordance between the two tests was very low (Kappa = 0.17, Kappa <0.4) and discordance was statically significant (P <0.001). The "X" sign had a sensitivity of 73.3%, specificity of 95.2%, positive predictive level of 97.1%, and negative predictive level of 62.5% in the diagnosis of herniated lumbar disk by MRI, while Lasègue’s sign showed sensitivity of 22.2%, specificity of 95.2% (P <0.001), positive predictive value of 90.9%, and negative predictive value of 36.4% (P = 0.153). CONCLUSION: Cecin’s sign had higher sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value than Lasègue’s sign in the diagnosis of symptomatic herniated lumbar disk.
Keywords
