Pilot and Feasibility Studies (Apr 2024)

A study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial investigating videoendoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy versus open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile cancer (VELRAD)

  • Stanley Tang,
  • Clare Akers,
  • Hussain Alnajjar,
  • Ben Ayres,
  • Cinzia Baldini,
  • Andrew Embleton-Thirsk,
  • Kurinchi Gurusamy,
  • Paul Hadway,
  • Vivekanandan Kumar,
  • Maurice Lau,
  • Raj Nigam,
  • Karl Pang,
  • Arie Parnham,
  • Elena Pizzo,
  • Veronica Ranieri,
  • Rowland Rees,
  • Vijay Sangar,
  • Anvi Wadke,
  • Norman Williams,
  • Asif Muneer

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01474-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Penile cancer is a rare male genital malignancy. Surgical excision of the primary tumour is followed by radical inguinal lymphadenectomy if there is metastatic disease detected by biopsy, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or following sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with impalpable disease. However, radical inguinal lymphadenectomy is associated with a high morbidity rate, and there is increasing usage of a videoendoscopic approach as an alternative. Methods A pragmatic, UK-wide multicentre feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT), comparing videoendoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy versus open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy. Patients will be identified and recruited from supraregional multi-disciplinary team meetings (sMDT) and must be aged 18 or over requiring inguinal lymphadenectomy, with no contraindications to surgical intervention for their cancer. Participants will be followed up for 6 months following randomisation. The primary outcome is the ability to recruit patients for randomisation across all selected sites and the rate of loss to follow-up. Other outcomes include acceptability of the trial and intervention to patients and healthcare professionals assessed by qualitative research and obtaining resource utilisation information for health economic analysis. Discussion There are currently no other published RCTs comparing videoendoscopic versus open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy. Ongoing study is required to determine whether randomising patients to either procedure is feasible and acceptable to patients. The results of this study may determine the design of a subsequent trial. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov PRS registry, registration number NCT05592639. Date of registration: 13th October 2022, retrospectively registered

Keywords