Women's Health Reports (Aug 2023)

A Study Evaluating the Accuracy of Triage for Breast Referrals During the Covid-19 Pandemic in a Tertiary Hospital

  • Ngee-Ming Goh,
  • Claudiu Simonca,
  • Maria Verroiotou,
  • Stephane Jenkins

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/WHR.2023.0021
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 1
pp. 409 – 414

Abstract

Read online

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of breast referral triage during Covid-19. Design: Retrospective case study. Setting: Primrose Breast Unit, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth. From March 17th to June 30th to encompass the height of the pandemic and the early enforced changes to practice. Participants: All referrals received, triaged, and seen (n?=?870) in the unit, identified by referral records. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measure of a positive disease state was of a histological diagnosis of cancer, with the absence of a cancer diagnosis representing a negative disease state. Accuracy has been determined by sensitivity and specificity calculations; thus defined by correctly triaging cancers to face-to-face clinics and benign cases to telephone or video clinics. Results: Sixty-eight cancers (7.8% of referrals) were detected after initial triage and consultation, of which 51 (sensitivity?=?75%) were triaged to one-stop-clinic; positive predictive value was 18.89%. Eight hundred two (specificity?=?72.69%) of benign cases were triaged to phone or video clinic initially; negative predictive value was 97.15%. Comparing the study's incidence of cancer (7.8%) to the preceding year's (2019) of 6.8% with Yate's correction shows no significant difference (p?<?0.05). Conclusion: Triage accuracy is sufficiently robust to diagnose cancer promptly, which should reassure clinicians and decision makers within the cancer networks.

Keywords