Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Jan 2021)

Automated follicular assessment using a novel two-dimensional ultrasound-based solution

  • Celine Firtion,
  • Ganesan Ramachandran,
  • Sindhu P Nellur Prakash,
  • Sujitkumar Hiwale,
  • Pallavi Vajinepalli,
  • Indira Manyam,
  • Devika Gunasheela

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/JMU.JMU_149_20
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 29, no. 4
pp. 264 – 269

Abstract

Read online

Background: High intra- and interobserver variability in the follicular assessment using two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound (US) is still a concern. To solve this issue, we have developed a novel software solution, which automatically provides follicles' count and their diameters using 2D US images obtained by a manual sweep of an ovary. The primary objective of this study was to compare the result of the automated solution with a manual 2D US-based assessment. Methods: In the first phase, multiple follicular US sweeps were collected from 54 subjects; these sweeps were used to develop the software. In the second phase, data from 10 subjects were collected for validation of the developed solution. During each phase, for follicles ≥5 mm, their count and diameters were recorded by the sonologist using 2D US. Results: For the total follicle count, a high correlation (0.787) was observed between the solution and manual assessment. The 95% limits of agreement between the two methods were in the range of 4.232 to −4.258. The two methods had an excellent correlation (0.817) for the measurement of mean follicular diameter. However, the solution had a tendency to underestimate the mean diameter by an average of 1.725 mm (±2.16 mm). The limits of agreement between the two methods for mean diameter measurement were from 2.508 to −5.960 mm. Conclusion: This study validates the feasibility of our solution for automatic assessment of follicle count and diameter with accuracy comparable to the 2D US-based manual assessment. We further observed that the solution's performance is better than known intra- and interobserver variability of the manual assessment. We recommend further validation of the solution to confirm these initial results and potential time gain with an automated assessment.

Keywords