BMJ Open (May 2022)

Qualitative study of patient experiences and care observations during agitation events in the emergency department: implications for systems-based practice

  • Ambrose H Wong,
  • Steven L Bernstein,
  • Jessica M Ray,
  • Caitlin McVaney,
  • Kimberly A Yonkers,
  • Christopher Eixenberger,
  • Lauren J Crispino,
  • John B Parker,
  • Alana Rosenberg,
  • Leah Robinson,
  • Joanne DeSanto Iennaco,
  • Anthony J Pavlo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059876
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 5

Abstract

Read online

Objectives Agitation, defined as excessive psychomotor activity leading to aggressive or violent behaviour, is prevalent in the emergency department (ED) due to rising behavioural-related visits. Experts recommend use of verbal de-escalation and avoidance of physical restraint to manage agitation. However, bedside applications of these recommendations may be limited by system challenges in emergency care. This qualitative study aims to use a systems-based approach, which considers the larger context and system of healthcare delivery, to identify sociotechnical, structural, and process-related factors leading to agitation events and physical restraint use in the ED.Design Qualitative study using a grounded theory approach to triangulate interviews of patients who have been physically restrained with direct observations of agitation events.Setting Two EDs in the Northeast USA, one at a tertiary care academic centre and the other at a community-based teaching hospital.Participants We recruited 25 individuals who experienced physical restraint during an ED visit. In addition, we performed 95 observations of clinical encounters of agitation events on unique patients. Patients represented both behavioural (psychiatric, alcohol/drug use) and non-behavioural (medical, trauma) chief complaints.Results Three primary themes with implications for systems-based practice of agitation events in the ED emerged: (1) pathways within health and social systems; (2) interpersonal contexts as reflections of systemic stressors on behavioural emergency care and (3) systems-based and patient-oriented strategies and solutions.Conclusions Agitation events represented manifestations of patients’ structural barriers to care from socioeconomic inequities and high burden of emotional and physical trauma as well as staff members’ simultaneous exposure to external stressors from social and healthcare systems. Potential long-term solutions may include care approaches that recognise agitated patients’ exposure to psychological trauma, improved coordination within the mental health emergency care network, and optimisation of physical environment conditions and organisational culture.