BMC Cardiovascular Disorders (Oct 2022)

Changes in R-wave amplitude at implantation are associated with gender and orientation of insertable cardiac monitor: observations from the confirm Rx™ body posture and physical activity study

  • Matthew Swale,
  • Vincent Paul,
  • Sinny Delacroix,
  • Glenn Young,
  • Luke McSpadden,
  • Kyungmoo Ryu,
  • David Di Fiore,
  • Maria Santos,
  • Isabel Tan,
  • Andre Conradie,
  • MyNgan Duong,
  • Nisha Schwarz,
  • Stephen Worthley,
  • Stephen Pavia

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02752-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 22, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are small subcutaneously implanted devices that detect changes in R-wave amplitudes (RWAs), effective in arrhythmia-monitoring. Although ICMs have proven to be immensely successful, electrical artefacts are frequent and can lead to misdiagnosis. Thus, there is a growing need to sustain and increase efficacy in detection rates by gaining insight into various patient-specific factors such as body postures and activities. Methods RWAs were measured in 15 separate postures, including supine, lying on the right-side (RS) or left-side (LS) and sitting, and two separate ICM orientations, immediately after implantation of Confirm Rx™ ICM in 99 patients. Results The patients (53 females and 46 males, mean ages 66.62 ± 14.7 and 66.40 ± 12.25 years, respectively) had attenuated RWAs in RS, LS and sitting by ~ 26.4%, ~ 27.8% and ~ 21.2% respectively, compared to supine. Gender-based analysis indicated RWAs in RS (0.32 mV (0.09–1.03 mV), p < 0.0001) and LS (0.37 mV (0.11–1.03 mV), p = 0.004) to be significantly attenuated compared to supine (0.52 mV (0.20–1.03 mV) for female participants. Similar attenuation was not evident for male participants. Further, parasternally oriented ICMs (n = 44), attenuated RWAs in RS (0.37 mV(0.09–1.03 mV), p = 0.05) and LS (0.34 mV (0.11–1.03 mV), p = 0.02) compared to supine (0.48 mV (0.09–1.03 mV). Similar differences were not observed in participants with ICMs in the 45°-relative-to-sternum (n = 46) orientation. When assessing the combined effect of gender and ICM orientation, female participants demonstrated plausible attenuation in RWAs for RS and LS postures compared to supine, an effect not observed in male participants. Conclusion This is the first known study depicting the effects on RWA due to body postures and activities immediately post-implantation with an overt impact by gender and orientation of ICM. Future work assessing the cause of gender-based differences in RWAs may be critical. Trial registration: Clinical Trials, NCT03803969. Registered 15 January 2019 – Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/NCT03803969

Keywords