PLoS ONE (Jan 2021)

Clinical-CT mismatch defined NIHSS ≥ 8 and CT-ASPECTS ≥ 9 as a reliable marker of candidacy for intravenous thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke.

  • Hung-Ming Wu,
  • I-Hui Lee,
  • Chao-Bao Luo,
  • Chih-Ping Chung,
  • Yung-Yang Lin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251077
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 4
p. e0251077

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundClinical-diffusion mismatch between stroke severity and diffusion-weighted imaging lesion volume seems to identify stroke patients with penumbra. However, urgent magnetic resonance imaging is sometimes inaccessible or contraindicated. Thus, we hypothesized that using brain computed tomography (CT) to determine a baseline "clinical-CT mismatch" may also predict the responses to thrombolytic therapy.MethodsBrain CT lesions were measured using the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS). A total of 104 patients were included: 79 patients with a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥ 8 and a CT-ASPECTS ≥ 9 who were defined as clinical-CT mismatch-positive (P group) and 25 patients with an NIHSS score ≥ 8 and a CT-ASPECTS ResultsPatients in the P group had a greater proportion of favorable outcome at 3 months (p = 0.032) and more frequent ENI (p = 0.038) and a greater delta NIHSS score (p = 0.001), as well as a lower proportion of END (p = 0.004) than those in the N group patients. There were no significant differences in the incidence rates of sICH and mortality between the two groups.ConclusionsClinical-CT mismatch may be able to predict which patients would benefit from intravenous thrombolysis.