Comparative effectiveness of an individualized model of hemodialysis vs conventional hemodialysis: a study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (the TwoPlus trial)
Mariana Murea,
Jochen G. Raimann,
Jasmin Divers,
Harvey Maute,
Cassandra Kovach,
Emaad M. Abdel-Rahman,
Alaa S. Awad,
Jennifer E. Flythe,
Samir C. Gautam,
Vandana D. Niyyar,
Glenda V. Roberts,
Nichole M. Jefferson,
Islam Shahidul,
Ucheoma Nwaozuru,
Kristie L. Foley,
Erica J. Trembath,
Merlo L. Rosales,
Alison J. Fletcher,
Sheikh I. Hiba,
Anne Huml,
Daphne H. Knicely,
Irtiza Hasan,
Bhaktidevi Makadia,
Raman Gaurav,
Janice Lea,
Paul T. Conway,
John T. Daugirdas,
Peter Kotanko,
on behalf of the Two Plus Research Consortium
Affiliations
Mariana Murea
Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Jochen G. Raimann
Renal Research Institute
Jasmin Divers
Department of Foundations of Medicine, Center for Population and Health Services Research, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine
Harvey Maute
Department of Foundations of Medicine, Center for Population and Health Services Research, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine
Cassandra Kovach
Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University
Emaad M. Abdel-Rahman
Division of Nephrology, University of Virginia Health System
Alaa S. Awad
Division of Nephrology, University of Florida
Jennifer E. Flythe
University of North Carolina (UNC) Kidney Center, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine
Samir C. Gautam
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Vandana D. Niyyar
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Emory University
Glenda V. Roberts
External Relations and Patient Engagement, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Kidney Research Institute and Center for Dialysis Innovation, University of Washington
Nichole M. Jefferson
Home Dialyzors United
Islam Shahidul
Department of Foundations of Medicine, Center for Population and Health Services Research, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine
Ucheoma Nwaozuru
Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Kristie L. Foley
Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Erica J. Trembath
Renal Research Institute
Merlo L. Rosales
Renal Research Institute
Alison J. Fletcher
Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Sheikh I. Hiba
Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Anne Huml
Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University
Daphne H. Knicely
Division of Nephrology, University of Virginia Health System
Irtiza Hasan
Division of Nephrology, University of Florida
Bhaktidevi Makadia
Division of Nephrology, University of Florida
Raman Gaurav
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Janice Lea
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Emory University
Paul T. Conway
American Association of Kidney Patients
John T. Daugirdas
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine
Peter Kotanko
Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, LLC Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Abstract Background Most patients starting chronic in-center hemodialysis (HD) receive conventional hemodialysis (CHD) with three sessions per week targeting specific biochemical clearance. Observational studies suggest that patients with residual kidney function can safely be treated with incremental prescriptions of HD, starting with less frequent sessions and later adjusting to thrice-weekly HD. This trial aims to show objectively that clinically matched incremental HD (CMIHD) is non-inferior to CHD in eligible patients. Methods An unblinded, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial will be conducted across diverse healthcare systems and dialysis organizations in the USA. Adult patients initiating chronic hemodialysis (HD) at participating centers will be screened. Eligibility criteria include receipt of fewer than 18 treatments of HD and residual kidney function defined as kidney urea clearance ≥3.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 and urine output ≥500 mL/24 h. The 1:1 randomization, stratified by site and dialysis vascular access type, assigns patients to either CMIHD (intervention group) or CHD (control group). The CMIHD group will be treated with twice-weekly HD and adjuvant pharmacologic therapy (i.e., oral loop diuretics, sodium bicarbonate, and potassium binders). The CHD group will receive thrice-weekly HD according to usual care. Throughout the study, patients undergo timed urine collection and fill out questionnaires. CMIHD will progress to thrice-weekly HD based on clinical manifestations or changes in residual kidney function. Caregivers of enrolled patients are invited to complete semi-annual questionnaires. The primary outcome is a composite of patients’ all-cause death, hospitalizations, or emergency department visits at 2 years. Secondary outcomes include patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes. We aim to enroll 350 patients, which provides ≥85% power to detect an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.9 between CMIHD and CHD with an IRR non-inferiority of 1.20 (α = 0.025, one-tailed test, 20% dropout rate, average of 2.06 years of HD per patient participant), and 150 caregiver participants (of enrolled patients). Discussion Our proposal challenges the status quo of HD care delivery. Our overarching hypothesis posits that CMIHD is non-inferior to CHD. If successful, the results will positively impact one of the highest-burdened patient populations and their caregivers. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05828823. Registered on 25 April 2023.