Metals (Apr 2022)

An Approach to Assessing S960QL Steel Welded Joints Using EBW and GMAW

  • Raghawendra Pratap Singh Sisodia,
  • Marcell Gáspár

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/met12040678
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 4
p. 678

Abstract

Read online

In recent years, ultra-high-strength structural (UHSS) steel in quenched and tempered (Q+T) conditions, for example, S960QL has been found in wider application areas such as structures, cranes, and trucks due to its extraordinary material properties and acceptable weldability. The motivation of the study is to investigate the unique capabilities of electron beam welding (EBW) compared to conventional gas metal arc welding (GMAW) for a deep, narrow weld with a small heat-affected zone (HAZ) and minimum thermal distortion of the welded joint without significantly affecting the mechanical properties. In this study, S960QL base material (BM) specimens with a thickness of 15 mm were butt-welded without filler material at a welding speed of 10 mm/s using the high-vacuum (2 × 10−4 mbar) EBW process. Microstructural characteristics were analyzed using an optical microscope (OM), a scanning electron microscope (SEM), fractography, and an electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analysis. The macro hardness, tensile strength, and instrumented Charpy-V impact test were performed to evaluate the mechanical properties. Further, the results of these tests of the EBW joints were compared with the GMAW joints of the same steel grade and thickness. Higher hardness is observed in the fusion zone (FZ) and the HAZ compared to the BM but under the limit of qualifying the hardness value (450 HV10) of Q+T steels according to the ISO 15614-11 specifications. The tensile strength of the EBW-welded joint (1044 MPa) reached the level of the BM as the specimens fractured in the BM. The FZ microstructure consists of fine dendritic martensite and the HAZ predominantly consists of martensite. Instrumented impact testing was performed on Charpy-V specimens at −40 °C, which showed the brittle behavior of both the FZ and HAZ but to a significantly lower extent compared to GMAW. The measured average impact toughness of the BM is 162 J and the average impact toughness value of the HAZ and FZ are 45 ± 11 J and 44 ± 20 J, respectively.

Keywords