Iraqi Geological Journal (Aug 2024)

A New Correlation for Estimating Static Elastic Properties of Sandstone Formations: Case Study from Rumaila Oilfield

  • Doaa Mahdi,
  • Ayad Alrazzaq

DOI
https://doi.org/10.46717/igj.57.2B.5ms-2024-8-15
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 57, no. 2B
pp. 77 – 88

Abstract

Read online

Evaluating the elastic characteristics of reservoir's rocks is crucial for the oil and gas sector to reduce risks throughout drilling and production operations. Elastic parameters are essential for prediction of wellbore stability, estimation of in-situ stresses, optimization of drilling performance and design of hydraulic fracturing. Depending on the type of formation, Elastic parameter is varied dramatically. Thus, a precise way to identify these characteristics is needed. Inaccurate assessment of elastic characteristics can result in excessive expenditure and inappropriate field development plans. Static elastic modulus (Est) can be determined through laboratory testing. Although laboratory measurement is the most precise approach to determine the elastic modulus, it requires a continuous core sample to acquire a complete profile of the formation's elastic characteristics. However, just a portion of the well is typically sampled for cores. On the other hand, wireline log data is applied to determine the dynamic modulus (Edyn), allowing for continuous assessment of elastic properties. Numerous characteristics of the rock, including consolidation, pore pressure and lithology affect the dynamic modulus. Thus, it needs to be converted to Static elastic modulus by empirical formulae. Several empirical equations have been proposed to convert dynamic Young's modulus to static Elastic modulus. Nevertheless, the validity of these relationships is restricted and exclusive to certain areas. This research seeks to establish a relationship between Dynamic modulus and static Elastic modulus for sandstone formation of Rumaila oil field. The suggested correlation provides accurate predictions of the static elastic modulus for the complete sandstone segment. The newly created correlation performed better than the previous correlations in predicting static elastic modulus with average absolute error of 8.69 %, and correlation coefficient of 0.9848. The newly established empirical correlation can assist geo-mechanical engineers in estimating continuous profile of the sandstone formation's static modulus.