Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Has Similar Rates of Prosthetic Noise Generation as Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract

Background: Noise has been reported to occur with relatively high frequency after conventional total knee arthroplasty (C-TKA), and this may impact the incidence of patient satisfaction and function. The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of patient-reported prosthetic noise generation after robotically-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) and C-TKA. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of unilateral primary RA-TKAs and C-TKAs performed between 2018 and 2021. Patients completed a survey consisting of 4 Likert scale questions related to prosthetic noise generation and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score Joint Replacement and Forgotten Joint Score were assessed prospectively preoperatively and at a minimum of 1-year of clinical follow-up. Statistical analysis was done utilizing T-tests and chi-square tests, with statistical significance defined as a P-value < .05. Results: One hundred sixty-two RA-TKAs and 320 C-TKAs with similar baseline characteristics and functions were included. There were no significant differences in hearing or feeling grinding, popping, clicking, or clunking (40.7% vs 38.1%; P = .647) between groups. Most RA-TKAs and C-TKAs were not dissatisfied regarding noise generation (70.4% vs 73.1%; P = .596). In both cohorts, patients who reported noise generation had lower average Forgotten Joint Scores (45.5 vs 66.1; P < .001) and lower postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score Joint Replacement scores (72.0 vs 81.4; P < .001) than those who did not experience noise generation. Conclusions: While RA-TKA may facilitate soft tissue balancing, there were no differences in prosthetic noise generation between RA-TKA and C-TKA. However, those who experience implant-generated noise have lower functional outcome scores.

Keywords

• Total knee arthroplasty
• TKA
• Robotic assisted
• Noise generation
• Satisfaction