Journal of Asthma and Allergy (May 2022)

Potential Drawbacks of ICS/LABA/LAMA Triple Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy in the Treatment of Asthma: A Quantitative Synthesis of Safety Profile

  • Rogliani P,
  • Cavalli F,
  • Chetta A,
  • Cazzola M,
  • Calzetta L

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 15
pp. 565 – 577

Abstract

Read online

Paola Rogliani,1 Francesco Cavalli,1 Alfredo Chetta,2 Mario Cazzola,1 Luigino Calzetta2 1Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy; 2Department of Medicine and Surgery, Respiratory Disease and Lung Function Unit, University of Parma, Parma, ItalyCorrespondence: Paola Rogliani, Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy, Email [email protected]: Inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-adrenoceptor agonist/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (ICS/LABA/LAMA) fixed-dose combination (FDC) is currently recommended as controller option at asthma Step 4 and as preferred treatment at asthma Step 5, but no research investigated the potential drawbacks of this therapeutic option in a large asthmatic population. Thus, the aim of this study was to quantify the potential drawbacks of triple FDC therapy in asthma.Methods: A pairwise meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA-P guidelines to assess the risk of overall serious adverse events (SAEs), cardiovascular SAEs, and pneumonia reported as SAE in asthmatic patients treated with ICS/LABA/LAMA FDC vs ICS/LABA FDC. A pooled analysis was performed to calculate the frequency of SAEs.Results: Data from 7204 asthmatic patients were extracted from the CAPTAIN, IRIDIUM, TRIMARAN, and TRIGGER studies. Triple FDC vs ICS/LABA FDC did not increase the risk of total SAEs (RR 0.99 95% CI 0.83– 1.18) and cardiac SAEs (RR 0.74 95% CI 0.39– 1.40), whereas the sensitivity analysis performed to resolve heterogeneity resulted in increased risk of vascular SAEs (RR 3.23 95% CI 1.05– 9.90, P< 0.05). The level of ICS dose did not modulate the risk of pneumonia, in any case pneumonia was the most frequent SAE (0.57%). These results were not affected by significant risk of bias.Conclusion: Triple FDC is a safe pharmacological therapy in severe asthmatic patients; it is characterized by a favourable safety profile and few potential drawbacks, namely, the increased risk of vascular SAEs, that certainly are worthy of future investigations.Keywords: asthma, cardiovascular, meta-analysis, pneumonia, safety, triple combination

Keywords