Development of a Subjective Symptom Rating Scale for Postoperative Oral Dysfunction in Patients with Oral Cancer: Reliability and Validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale-10
Yuhei Matsuda,
Isami Kumakura,
Tatsuo Okui,
Masaaki Karino,
Noriaki Aoi,
Satoe Okuma,
Mayu Takeda,
Kenji Hayashida,
Tatsunori Sakamoto,
Takahiro Kanno
Affiliations
Yuhei Matsuda
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan
Isami Kumakura
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan
Tatsuo Okui
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan
Masaaki Karino
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan
Noriaki Aoi
Department of Otolaryngology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan
Satoe Okuma
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan
Mayu Takeda
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan
Kenji Hayashida
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shimane University Hospital, Izumo 693-8501, Japan
Tatsunori Sakamoto
Department of Otolaryngology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan
Takahiro Kanno
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan
Currently, there is no scale to subjectively assess postoperative oral dysfunction in patients with oral cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale (POD-10) that we developed. Between September 2019 and August 2021, 62 eligible oral cancer patients (median age, 72 years; 42 men and 20 women) were enrolled in the study. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, which indicates the internal consistency of the scale, was 0.94, and the intraclass correlation coefficient, which indicates reproducibility, was 0.85 (95% confidential interval: 0.40–0.96, p p p < 0.05). Twenty-four points were calculated as the cutoff value for POD-10 using receiver operating characteristic analysis to calculate the cutoff value. The POD-10 was shown to be a clinically reliable and valid scale that can be used to subjectively assess postoperative oral dysfunction in patients with oral cancer and is expected to be used as a simple diagnostic tool.