Applied Sciences (Feb 2020)

FirepanIF: High Performance Host-Side Flash Cache Warm-Up Method in Cloud Computing

  • Hyunchan Park,
  • Munkyu Lee,
  • Cheol-Ho Hong

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app10031014
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 3
p. 1014

Abstract

Read online

In cloud computing, a shared storage server, which provides a network-attached storage device, is usually used for centralized data management. However, when multiple virtual machines (VMs) concurrently access the storage server through the network, the performance of each VM may decrease due to limited bandwidth. To address this issue, a flash-based storage device such as a solid state drive (SSD) is often employed as a cache in the host server. This host-side flash cache saves remote data, which are frequently accessed by the VM, locally in the cache. However, frequent VM migration in the data center can weaken the effectiveness of a host-side flash cache as the migrated VM needs to warm up its flash cache again on the destination machine. This study proposes Cachemior, Firepan, and FirepanIF for rapid flash-cache migration in cloud computing. Cachemior warms up the flash cache with a data preloading approach using the shared storage server after VM migration. However, it does not achieve a satisfactory level of performance. Firepan and FirepanIF use the source node’s flash cache as the data source for flash cache warm-up. They can migrate the flash-cache more quickly than conventional methods as they can avoid storage and network congestion on the shared storage server. Firepan incurs downtime of the VM during flash cache migration for data consistency. FirepanIF minimizes the VM downtime with the invalidation filter, which traces the I/O activity of the migrated VM during flash cache migration in order to invalidate inconsistent cache blocks. We implement and evaluate the three flash cache migration techniques in a realistic virtualized environment. FirepanIF demonstrates that it can improve the performance of the I/O workload by up to 21.87% compared to conventional methods.

Keywords