Renal Replacement Therapy (Jul 2021)

Peritoneal Dialysis Guidelines 2019 Part 1 (Position paper of Japanese Society of Dialysis Therapy)

  • Yasuhiko Ito,
  • Munekazu Ryuzaki,
  • Hitoshi Sugiyama,
  • Tadashi Tomo,
  • Akihiro C. Yamashita,
  • Yuichi Ishikawa,
  • Atsushi Ueda,
  • Yoshie Kanazawa,
  • Yoshihiko Kanno,
  • Noritomo Itami,
  • Minoru Ito,
  • Hideki Kawanishi,
  • Masaaki Nakayama,
  • Kazuhiko Tsuruya,
  • Hideki Yokoi,
  • Mizuya Fukasawa,
  • Hiroyuki Terawaki,
  • Kei Nishiyama,
  • Hiroshi Hataya,
  • Kenichiro Miura,
  • Riku Hamada,
  • Hyogo Nakakura,
  • Motoshi Hattori,
  • Hidemichi Yuasa,
  • Hidetomo Nakamoto

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41100-021-00348-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 1
pp. 1 – 77

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Approximately 10 years have passed since the Peritoneal Dialysis Guidelines were formulated in 2009. Much evidence has been reported during the succeeding years, which were not taken into consideration in the previous guidelines, e.g., the next peritoneal dialysis PD trial of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) in Japan, the significance of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), the effects of icodextrin solution, new developments in peritoneal pathology, and a new international recommendation on a proposal for exit-site management. It is essential to incorporate these new developments into the new clinical practice guidelines. Meanwhile, the process of creating such guidelines has changed dramatically worldwide and differs from the process of creating what were “clinical practice guides.” For this revision, we not only conducted systematic reviews using global standard methods but also decided to adopt a two-part structure to create a reference tool, which could be used widely by the society’s members attending a variety of patients. Through a working group consensus, it was decided that Part 1 would present conventional descriptions and Part 2 would pose clinical questions (CQs) in a systematic review format. Thus, Part 1 vastly covers PD that would satisfy the requirements of the members of the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy (JSDT). This article is the duplicated publication from the Japanese version of the guidelines and has been reproduced with permission from the JSDT.

Keywords