Comparison of Different Methods for Spongin-like Collagen Extraction from Marine Sponges (<i>Chondrilla caribensis</i> and <i>Aplysina fulva</i>): Physicochemical Properties and In Vitro Biological Analysis
Tiago A. T. Araújo,
Amanda de Souza,
Alan F. Santana,
Anna Rafaela C. Braga,
Márcio R. Custódio,
Fábio R. Simões,
Gabriela M. Araújo,
Antônio Miranda,
Flávio Alves,
Renata N. Granito,
Na Yu,
Ana Claudia M. Renno
Affiliations
Tiago A. T. Araújo
Department of Biosciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos 11015-220, SP, Brazil
Amanda de Souza
Department of Biosciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos 11015-220, SP, Brazil
Alan F. Santana
Department of Biosciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos 11015-220, SP, Brazil
Anna Rafaela C. Braga
Department of Biosciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos 11015-220, SP, Brazil
Márcio R. Custódio
Laboratory of Marine Invertebrates Cell Biology, Institute of Biosciences, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo 05508-090, SP, Brazil
Fábio R. Simões
Institute of Marine Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos 11070-100, SP, Brazil
Gabriela M. Araújo
Institute of Marine Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos 11070-100, SP, Brazil
Antônio Miranda
Department of Biophysics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo 04044-020, SP, Brazil
Flávio Alves
Department of Biophysics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo 04044-020, SP, Brazil
Renata N. Granito
Department of Biosciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos 11015-220, SP, Brazil
Na Yu
National Dental Centre Singapore, 5 Second Hospital Avenue, Singapore 168938, Singapore
Ana Claudia M. Renno
Department of Biosciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos 11015-220, SP, Brazil
This study aimed to compare different protocols (Protocol 1: P1; Protocol 2: P2; Protocol 3: P3; Protocol 4: P4) for the extraction of spongin-like collagen (SC) from marine sponges. The SEM micrographs demonstrated a fibrillar structure for the extracts from Chondrilla caribensis and the nodular/particulate aggregates for Aplysina fulva. FTIR showed for all samples peaks similar to collagen for both species. For C. caribensis, the extracts obtained using P2, P3, and P4 protocols presented higher values of extraction yield, TPQ, and GAGs. P2 and P4 showed higher values of SC concentration and for antioxidant analysis. For A. fulva, P2, P3, and P4 provided a higher extraction yield besides an increase in the antioxidant assay. For both species, no difference was observed for Col quantification and TPQ analysis; also, higher values of GAGs were found using P2 and P4. Fibroblast proliferation observed for C. caribensis was lower for P1 on day 1 and for P2 and P3 on day 3 (for 50%) compared to the control group. There was a significant reduction in fibroblast cell proliferation for all A. fulva extracts evaluated. It can be concluded that protocols P2 and P4 were more efficient for extracting SC from C. caribensis.