Cancers (Aug 2022)

Targeted Long-Read Bisulfite Sequencing Identifies Differences in the <i>TERT</i> Promoter Methylation Profiles between <i>TERT</i> Wild-Type and <i>TERT</i> Mutant Cancer Cells

  • Seungjae Lee,
  • Ti-Cheng Chang,
  • Patrick Schreiner,
  • Yiping Fan,
  • Neeraj Agarwal,
  • Charles Owens,
  • Reinhard Dummer,
  • John M. Kirkwood,
  • Raymond L. Barnhill,
  • Dan Theodorescu,
  • Gang Wu,
  • Armita Bahrami

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14164018
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 16
p. 4018

Abstract

Read online

Background: TERT promoter methylation, located several hundred base pairs upstream of the transcriptional start site, is cancer specific and correlates with increased TERT mRNA expression and poorer patient outcome. Promoter methylation, however, is not mutually exclusive to TERT activating genetic alterations, as predicted for functionally redundant mechanisms. To annotate the altered patterns of TERT promoter methylation and their relationship with gene expression, we applied a Pacific Biosciences-based, long-read, bisulfite-sequencing technology and compared the differences in the methylation marks between wild-type and mutant cancers in an allele-specific manner. Results: We cataloged TERT genetic alterations (i.e., promoter point mutations or structural variations), allele-specific promoter methylation patterns, and allele-specific expression levels in a cohort of 54 cancer cell lines. In heterozygous mutant cell lines, the mutant alleles were significantly less methylated than their silent, mutation-free alleles (p TERT distal promoter, but differentially methylated in the proximal regions. ChIP analysis showed that epialleles with the hypomethylated proximal and core promoter were enriched in the active histone mark H3K4me2/3, whereas epialleles that were methylated in those regions were enriched in the repressive histone mark H3K27me3. Decitabine therapy induced biallelic expression in the wild-type cancer cells, whereas the mutant cell lines were unaffected. Conclusions: Long-read bisulfite sequencing analysis revealed differences in the methylation profiles and responses to demethylating agents between TERT wild-type and genetically altered cancer cell lines. The causal relation between TERT promoter methylation and gene expression remains to be established.

Keywords