Biomarker Insights (May 2010)

Feasibility of High-Throughput Genome-Wide Genotyping using DNA from Stored Buccal Cell Samples

  • Stephanie J. Loomis,
  • Lana M. Olson,
  • Louis R. Pasquale,
  • Janey Wiggs,
  • Daniel Mirel,
  • Andrew Crenshaw,
  • Melissa Parkin,
  • Brandon Rahhal,
  • Stephanie Tetreault,
  • Peter Kraft,
  • Shelley S. Tworoger,
  • Jonathan L. Haines,
  • Jae H. Kang

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2010, no. 5
pp. 49 – 55

Abstract

Read online

It is unclear if buccal cell samples contain sufficient human DNA with adequately sized fragments for high throughput genetic bioassays. Yet buccal cell sample collection is an attractive alternative to gathering blood samples for genetic epidemiologists engaged in large-scale genetic biomarker studies. We assessed the genotyping efficiency (GE) and genotyping concordance (GC) of buccal cell DNA samples compared to corresponding blood DNA samples, from 32 Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) participants using the Illumina Infinium 660W-Quad platform. We also assessed how GE and GC accuracy varied as a function of DNA concentration using serial dilutions of buccal DNA samples. Finally we determined the nature and genomic distribution of discordant genotypes in buccal DNA samples. The mean GE of undiluted buccal cell DNA samples was high (99.32%), as was the GC between the paired buccal and blood samples (99.29%). GC between the dilutions versus the undiluted buccal DNA was also very high (.97%), though both GE and GC notably declined at DNA concentrations less than 5 ng/µl. Most (.95%) genotype determinations in buccal cell samples were of the “missing call” variety (as opposed to the “alternative genotype call” variety) across the spectrum of buccal DNA concentrations studied. Finally, for buccal DNA concentration above 1.7 ng/ul, discordant genotyping calls did not cluster in any particular chromosome. Buccal cell-derived DNA represents a viable alternative to blood DNA for genotyping on a high-density platform.