Clinical Ophthalmology (Jul 2018)

Cone photoreceptor macular function and recovery after photostress in early non-exudative age-related macular degeneration

  • Rodriguez JD,
  • Lane K,
  • Hollander DA,
  • Shapiro A,
  • Saigal S,
  • Hertsenberg AJ,
  • Wallstrom G,
  • Narayanan D,
  • Angjeli E,
  • Abelson MB

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 12
pp. 1325 – 1335

Abstract

Read online

John D Rodriguez,1 Keith Lane,1 David A Hollander,1,2 Aron Shapiro,1 Sunita Saigal,1 Andrew J Hertsenberg,1 Garrick Wallstrom,3 Divya Narayanan,1 Endri Angjeli,1 Mark B Abelson1,4 1Ora, Inc., Andover, MA, USA; 2Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 3Statistics and Data Corporation, Tempe, AZ, USA; 4Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Purpose: To identify parameters from cone function and recovery after photostress that detect functional deficits in early non-exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and to determine the repeatability of these parameters. Methods: Cone-mediated visual function recovery after photostress was examined in three groups of subjects: young normal subjects (ages 20–29; N=8), older normal subjects (ages 50–90; N=9), and early non-exudative AMD subjects (ages 50–90; N=12). Eight AMD and four normal subjects were retested 1 year after the initial evaluation. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity (VA) and parameters of cone function (baseline cone sensitivity and cone recovery half-life following photobleach) were measured and compared between AMD and normal subjects. Short-term repeatability was assessed for each subject’s initial evaluation. Long-term repeatability was assessed by comparing outcomes from the initial evaluation and 1-year follow-up. Results: The mean baseline cone threshold was significantly worse in subjects with early AMD compared to older normal subjects (-1.80±0.04 vs -1.57±0.06 log cd/m2 p=0.0027). Moreover, the baseline cone threshold parameter exhibited good short-term (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.88) and long-term (ICC=0.85) repeatability in all subjects. The cone intercept parameter and ETDRS VA were not significantly different between AMD and older normal subject groups. Cone recovery half-life was significantly different between older normal and AMD subject groups (p=0.041). Neither ETDRS VA nor cone function parameters were significantly different for any group at the 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: The baseline cone threshold shows potential as a novel parameter to assess visual dysfunction in early AMD. This outcome consistently detected deficits in AMD subjects, and differentiated them from age-matched controls with high test–retest repeatability. Keywords: AMD, photobleach, photoreceptor, cone recovery, Ora LUX

Keywords