Frontiers in Endocrinology (Oct 2022)

Optical coherence tomography of the retina combined with color Doppler ultrasound of the tibial nerve in the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy

  • Weimiao Chen,
  • Xiaohong Wu,
  • Shilin Li,
  • Yan Zhang,
  • Yinqiong Huang,
  • Yong Zhuang,
  • Xuefeng Bai,
  • Xiaoyu Chen,
  • Xiahong Lin,
  • Xiahong Lin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.938659
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

ObjectiveTo investigate the value of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in the optic disc and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of lower limb nerves in the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) separately and in combination.MethodsA total of 140 patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled, including 51 patients with DPN (DPN group) and 89 patients without DPN (NDPN group). Clinical data and biochemical parameters were collected. Electromyography/evoked potential instrument was performed for nerve conduction study. Optical coherence tomography was performed to measure the RNFL thickness of the optic disc. Color Doppler ultrasound was performed to measure CSA of lower limb nerves.ResultsThe RNFL thickness was lower and the CSA of the tibial nerve (TN) in the DPN group was larger than that in the NDPN group. The album/urine creatinine ratio, diabetic retinopathy, and CSA of TN at 3 cm were positively correlated with DPN. The RNFL thickness in the superior quadrant of the optic disc was negatively correlated with DPN. For RNFL thickness to diagnose DPN, the area under the curve (AUC) of the superior quadrant was the largest, which was 0.723 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.645–0.805), and the best cutoff value was 127.5 μm (70.5% sensitivity, 72.1% specificity). For CSA of TN to diagnose DPN, the AUC of the distance of 5 cm was the largest, which was 0.660 (95% CI: 0.575–0.739), and the best cutoff value was 13.50 mm2 (82.0% sensitivity, 41.6% specificity). For the combined index, the AUC was greater than that of the above two indicators, which was 0.755 (95% CI: 0.664–0.846), and the best cutoff value was 0.376 (64.3% sensitivity, 83.0% specificity).ConclusionsPatients with DPN have a reduction of the RNFL thickness and an increase in the CSA of TN, and these two changes are related to DPN. The RNFL thickness of the optic disc and the CSA of TN can be used as diagnostic indicators of DPN, and the combination of the two indicators has a higher diagnostic value.

Keywords