Vasopressin and Terlipressin in the Treatment of Vasodilatory Septic Shock: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Background: Vasodilatory septic shock unresponsive to fluid resuscitation requires the addition of vasopressors. Catecholamines remain the first line vasopressor therapy, but treatment failure is a potential problem. Vasopressin and its analogue, terlipressin, have been used for this indication. Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of vasopressin and terlipressin on mortality and morbidity outcomes in patients with vasodilatory shock. Secondary outcomes include the effects of vasopressin and terlipressin on haemodynamic stability and organ function. Method: A computerised search of MEDLINE from January 1966 till June 2010 and screening of references of relevant articles were conducted. Only prospective, randomised controlled trials comparing vasopressin or terlipressin versus standard vasopressors or placebo were included. Results: Seven studies using vasopressin, three using terlipressin and one using both were identified. Four vasopressin trials assessing mortality and morbidity outcomes showed a trend towards benefit for mortality in adults but possibly adverse outcomes in a small paediatric study. No data was available on the long-term mortality and morbidity outcomes of terlipressin. Vasopressin and terlipressin were similar to standard vasopressors in maintaining haemodynamic parameters, while allowing a beneficial catecholamine-sparing effect. These agents also had a neutral to positive effect on organ function. Conclusion: Vasopressin and terlipressin was comparable to conventional agents in the maintenance of haemodynamic stability and organ function in vasodilatory shock. Since morbidity and mortality data do not differentiate vasopressin and terlipressin from catecholamines, their role remains unclear. More large studies evaluating the long-term outcomes in this group of patients are required.