Comparison of ultrasound and mammography for early diagnosis of breast cancer among Chinese women with suspected breast lesions: A prospective trial

Abstract

Abstract Background Ultrasound is more widely used than mammography for early diagnosis of breast cancer in China as most Chinese women have small and dense mammary glands. This study compared the diagnostic performance of ultrasound and mammography for breast cancer among Chinese women with suspected breast lesions. Methods From November 2019 to November 2021, we compared the results of ultrasound and mammography for breast lesion diagnosis in 2737 consecutive participants with suspected breast lesions; all patients underwent biopsies. We measured the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy separately. Results Among the 2737 participants, 2844 breast lesions were detected, including 1935 (68.0%) breast cancers and 909 (32.0%) benign lesions. Of the breast cancers, ultrasound detected 1851 (95.7%), whereas mammography detected 1527 (78.9%). The sensitivity of ultrasound for breast cancer diagnosis was significantly higher than that of mammography (95.7% vs. 78.9%, p < 0.001), whereas the specificity was significantly lower than that of mammography (42.9% vs. 62.3%, p < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curves revealed that ultrasound was more accurate in detecting breast cancer than mammography (76.8% vs. 71.3%, p < 0.001). Age, body mass index, and breast density did not influence ultrasound sensitivity and accuracy. Conclusions Ultrasound is more sensitive and accurate than mammography and detects more breast cancers with a lower specificity.

Keywords

• breast cancer
• early diagnosis
• mammography
• ultrasound