A feasibility study of avoiding positive calcium balance and parathyroid hormone increase in patients on peritoneal dialysis
Maria Clara Teixeira Piraciaba,
Lilian Cordeiro,
Erica Adelina Guimarães,
Hugo Abensur,
Benedito Jorge Pereira,
Vanda Jorgetti,
Rosa Maria Affonso Moysés,
Rosilene Motta Elias
Affiliations
Maria Clara Teixeira Piraciaba
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Lilian Cordeiro
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Erica Adelina Guimarães
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Hugo Abensur
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Benedito Jorge Pereira
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), Brazil
Vanda Jorgetti
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Rosa Maria Affonso Moysés
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Rosilene Motta Elias
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), Brazil; Corresponding author at: Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Serviço de Nefrologia, Rua Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar 255, 7° andar, São Paulo CEP 05403-000, SP, Brazil.
Background: The effect of the dialysate calcium concentration (D[Ca]) on mineral and bone metabolism in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) is overlooked. D[Ca] of 1.75 mmol/L is still prescribed to many patients on PD around the world. Previous studies on the effects of reducing D[Ca] have been carried out before the incorporation of calcimimetics in clinical practice. We hypothesized that a reduction in D[Ca] is safe and without the risk of a rise in serum parathyroid hormone (PTH). Methods: In this non-randomized clinical trial, the D[Ca] was reduced from 1.75 mmol/L to 1.25 mmol/L for one year in prevalent patients on PD. Demographic, clinical, and CKD-MBD-related biomarkers were evaluated at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. Results: 20 patients completed 1-year follow-up (56 ± 16 years, 50 % male, 25 % diabetic, 55 % with baseline parathyroid hormone – PTH >300 pg/mL). Over time, there was no significant change in calcium, phosphate, total alkaline phosphatase, 25(OH)-vitamin D or PTH, although adjustments in calcitriol and sevelamer prescription were required. After 1 year, absolute and percentual change in PTH levels were 36 (−58, 139) pg/mL, and 20 % (−28, 45) respectively. The proportion of patients with PTH > 300 pg/mL did not change during the follow-up (p = 0.173). Conclusion: Knowing the risk of a positive calcium balance in patients on PD, reducing the D[Ca] concentration is a safe and valuable option, although medication adjustments are needed to detain PTH rising.