Sensors (Mar 2021)

Exploring Signals on L5/E5a/B2a for Dual-Frequency GNSS Precise Point Positioning

  • Nacer Naciri,
  • André Hauschild,
  • Sunil Bisnath

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s21062046
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 6
p. 2046

Abstract

Read online

Due to its nature, Precise Point Positioning (PPP) depends on the GNSS measurements and quality of satellite correction products used to relatively quickly provide precise and accurate positions. With the rapid evolution of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs), new frequencies and signals are being broadcast, which have a positive impact on PPP performance. This paper presents, for the first time, a comprehensive analysis of PPP performance from these new GPS, Galileo and BeiDou-2/3 signals, which are not yet commonly used for PPP, with correct mitigation of errors such as the estimation of GPS Block-IIF L5 variations. Satellite orbits and clocks, as well as GPS Block-IIF L5 corrections, are estimated in real-time using DLR’s RETICLE engine, while the user processing is performed with York University’s PPP engine. First, as a reference, PPP performance is assessed on widely used signals: GPS L1/L2, Galileo E1/E5a, and BeiDou-2/3 B1-2/B3. Horizontal and vertical rms of 2.3 and 2.6 cm, respectively, are achieved in static processing and 5.4 and 7.5 cm in kinematic processing after 1 h of processing using real-time satellite correction products. The compatibility of BeiDou-2 and BeiDou-3 on the shared B1-2/B3 frequencies is analyzed and discrepancies in the receiver clock are found. Next, since all three constellations share two common frequencies, the paper focuses on analyzing PPP performance of GPS, Galileo and BeiDou-3 on [L1, E1, B1] at 1575.42 MHz and [L5, E5a, B2a] at 1176.45 MHz. Horizontal and vertical rms of 6.9 and 7.1 cm are achieved in kinematic processing. The effect of the known GPS Block-IIF L5 biases is studied as well, as it is shown to affect the receiver position and clock, as well as the ionospheric estimates and ambiguities. Average improvements of 15% and 20% in the horizontal and vertical rms, respectively, are observed when these biases are mitigated.

Keywords