Molecular Subgroup Is the Strongest Predictor of Medulloblastoma Outcome in a Resource-Limited Country

Abstract

PURPOSEMedulloblastoma is composed of four clinically and prognostically distinct molecular subgroups (WNT, SHH, group 3, and group 4). However, the clinical implications of these subgroups in the context of the unique challenges of low- to middle-income countries are rarely reported.METHODSWe assembled an institutional cohort of children (3-18 years) diagnosed with medulloblastoma and treated in Jordan between 2003 and 2016. Tumors were subgrouped by NanoString and correlated with clinical and radiologic characteristics.RESULTSEighty-eight patients were identified (63% male); median age was 6.9 years (interquartile range 4.8-9.2) and median symptom duration was 6 weeks (interquartile range 4-11). Radiotherapy was implemented as standard-risk in 41 patients (47%) and high-risk in 47 patients (53%). Subgrouping revealed 17 WNT (19%), 22 SHH (25%), 21 group 3 (24%), and 28 group 4 tumors (32%). Median time between craniotomy and radiotherapy was 45 days (17-155); 44% of them > 49 days. Median duration of radiotherapy was 44 days (36-74). Seventy-two patients (82%) received chemotherapy afterward. With a median follow-up of 4.6 years (0.2-14.9), 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 73.5% and 69.4%, respectively, with no statistically significant survival difference between standard-risk and high-risk patients. Metastasis was significant for overall survival (P = .011). Patients with SHH and group 4 tumors had very good PFS (83.4% and 87.0%, respectively) and those with group 3 tumors had dismal outcomes (PFS 44.9%), whereas WNT tumors had less-than expected PFS (70.5%). PFS was statistically significant in patients with nonmetastatic tumors receiving radiotherapy ≤ 49 days (P = .011), particularly group 3 tumors.CONCLUSIONPatients with SHH and group 4 medulloblastoma had excellent survival comparable with high-income countries. Compliance with treatment protocols and avoiding radiotherapy delays are important in achieving adequate survival in low- to middle-income country settings. Subgroup-driven treatment protocols should be considered in countries with limited resources.