HemaSphere (May 2024)

Toward a more patient‐centered drug development process in clinical trials for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS): Practical considerations from the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS)

  • Fabio Efficace,
  • Rena Buckstein,
  • Gregory A. Abel,
  • Johannes M. Giesinger,
  • Pierre Fenaux,
  • Jan Philipp Bewersdorf,
  • Andrew M. Brunner,
  • Rafael Bejar,
  • Uma Borate,
  • Amy E. DeZern,
  • Peter Greenberg,
  • Gail J. Roboz,
  • Michael R. Savona,
  • Francesco Sparano,
  • Jacqueline Boultwood,
  • Rami Komrokji,
  • David A. Sallman,
  • Zhuoer Xie,
  • Guillermo Sanz,
  • Hetty E. Carraway,
  • Justin Taylor,
  • Stephen D. Nimer,
  • Matteo Giovanni Della Porta,
  • Valeria Santini,
  • Maximilian Stahl,
  • Uwe Platzbecker,
  • Mikkael A. Sekeres,
  • Amer M. Zeidan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hem3.69
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 5
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Notable treatment advances have been made in recent years for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS), and several new drugs are under development. For example, the emerging availability of oral MDS therapies holds the promise of improving patients' health‐related quality of life (HRQoL). Within this rapidly evolving landscape, the inclusion of HRQoL and other patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) is critical to inform the benefit/risk assessment of new therapies or to assess whether patients live longer and better, for what will likely remain a largely incurable disease. We provide practical considerations to support investigators in generating high‐quality PRO data in future MDS trials. We first describe several challenges that are to be thoughtfully considered when designing an MDS‐focused clinical trial with a PRO endpoint. We then discuss aspects related to the design of the study, including PRO assessment strategies. We also discuss statistical approaches illustrating the potential value of time‐to‐event analyses and their implications within the estimand framework. Finally, based on a literature review of MDS randomized controlled trials with a PRO endpoint, we note the PRO items that deserve special attention when reporting future MDS trial results. We hope these practical considerations will facilitate the generation of rigorous PRO data that can robustly inform MDS patient care and support treatment decision‐making for this patient population.