PLoS ONE (Jan 2017)

Consequences of increasing convection onto patient care and protein removal in hemodialysis.

  • Nathalie Gayrard,
  • Alain Ficheux,
  • Flore Duranton,
  • Caroline Guzman,
  • Ilan Szwarc,
  • Fernando Vetromile,
  • Chantal Cazevieille,
  • Philippe Brunet,
  • Marie-Françoise Servel,
  • Àngel Argilés,
  • Moglie Le Quintrec

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171179
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 2
p. e0171179

Abstract

Read online

INTRODUCTION:Recent randomised controlled trials suggest that on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) improves survival, provided that it reaches high convective volumes. However, there is scant information on the feasibility and the consequences of modifying convection volumes in clinics. METHODS:Twelve stable dialysis patients were treated with high-flux 1.8 m2 polysulphone dialyzers and 4 levels of convection flows (QUF) based on GKD-UF monitoring of the system, for 1 week each. The consequences on dialysis delivery (transmembrane pressure (TMP), number of alarms, % of achieved prescribed convection) and efficacy (mass removal of low and high molecular weight compounds) were analysed. RESULTS:TMP increased exponentially with QUF (p56,000 monitoring values). Beyond 21 L/session, this resulted into frequent TMP alarms requiring nursing staff interventions (mean ± SEM: 10.3 ± 2.2 alarms per session, p 20L) is feasible by setting an HDF system at its optimal conditions based upon the GKD-UF monitoring. Prescribing higher convection volumes resulted in instability of the system, provoked alarms, was bothersome for the nursing staff and the patients, rarely achieved the prescribed convection volumes and increased removal of high molecular weight compounds, notably albumin.