BMC Cardiovascular Disorders (Apr 2025)

Factors analysis of lower probability of receiving bystander CPR in females: a web-based survey

  • Wangxinjun Cheng,
  • Jingshuang Liu,
  • Chufan Zhou,
  • Xuzhen Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-025-04709-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Women are less likely to receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) compared to men. This study aims to identify the factors influencing the willingness to perform CPR on women, providing insights to improve training and public awareness. Methods A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted among medical and non-medical populations in southeastern China. The questionnaire assessed demographics, CPR training experience, and attitudes toward gender-related CPR concerns. A total of 450 responses were collected, with 433 valid responses included after quality control. Statistical analyses were performed using R4.3.2 to evaluate the impact of gender, age, occupation, and education on CPR willingness. Results Women exhibited a higher willingness to perform CPR on female victims compared to men. Many male respondents hesitated due to concerns about physical contact, particularly regarding removing clothing during resuscitation. Younger individuals (18–35 and 36–50 years) showed greater willingness to provide CPR than older respondents (51–75 years), who were more cautious due to privacy concerns and traditional beliefs. Healthcare professionals and non-medical workers were more likely to perform CPR than medical students, who, despite receiving CPR training, expressed hesitation due to a lack of confidence and practical experience. Higher education levels were associated with increased willingness to perform CPR on women, with postgraduate respondents being the most willing. Additionally, most participants had never practiced on female CPR mannequins, despite widespread support—especially among women—for incorporating female models into training. Conclusion The lower likelihood of women receiving CPR is influenced by gender bias, societal norms, and training limitations. Addressing this issue requires public education to eliminate gender-based hesitation, improvements in CPR training programs to include female mannequins, and enhanced legal protections to reduce rescuer concerns. These measures can be combined with other key factors such as community-wide CPR training programs and increasing the availability of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) to help promote equity in access to life-saving interventions. Targeted interventions can promote gender equity in emergency response, ultimately improving survival outcomes for women.

Keywords