Substantive bias and the positional extension of major place contrasts

Abstract

The role of phonetic naturalness in biasing the learning of sound patterns remains an unsettled question in phonology. The present study investigates naturalness bias in phonotactic learning using a novel experimental paradigm that tests whether learners reproduce a phonetically-motivated phonotactic implicational about the distribution of major place contrasts in stops. Stops differing in place of articulation are easier to distinguish word-initially than word-finally, so place contrasts in word-final position should also exist in word-initial position. The reverse is not necessarily true. This implicational is typologically supported as well as motivated by perceptual naturalness. In two artificial grammar learning experiments, I exposed participants to place contrasts in stops either word-initially or word-finally and tested whether they extended the contrasts to the other word-edge position. Participants successfully learned to recognize novel words that fit the phonotactic pattern they had been trained on, but they were equally willing to extend the place contrasts in both directions, yielding no evidence for naturalness bias. These results contrast with those of a similar study that found asymmetric extension of the stop voicing contrast, supporting an effect of naturalness bias. Confusion data suggests that the reduction in perceptibility from word-initial to word-final position may be greater for stop voicing than for stop place of articulation. This difference may underlie the divergent results of the two studies, leading to the hypothesis that the strength of a substantive bias depends on the magnitude of its phonetic precursor.

Keywords

• artificial grammar learning
• phonotactic learning
• substantive bias
• major place contrasts
• perceptibility