Frontiers in Radiology (Aug 2023)

Deep learning image segmentation approaches for malignant bone lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Joseph M. Rich,
  • Lokesh N. Bhardwaj,
  • Aman Shah,
  • Krish Gangal,
  • Mohitha S. Rapaka,
  • Assad A. Oberai,
  • Brandon K. K. Fields,
  • George R. Matcuk,
  • Vinay A. Duddalwar,
  • Vinay A. Duddalwar

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2023.1241651
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionImage segmentation is an important process for quantifying characteristics of malignant bone lesions, but this task is challenging and laborious for radiologists. Deep learning has shown promise in automating image segmentation in radiology, including for malignant bone lesions. The purpose of this review is to investigate deep learning-based image segmentation methods for malignant bone lesions on Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and Positron-Emission Tomography/CT (PET/CT).MethodThe literature search of deep learning-based image segmentation of malignant bony lesions on CT and MRI was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus electronic databases following the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A total of 41 original articles published between February 2017 and March 2023 were included in the review.ResultsThe majority of papers studied MRI, followed by CT, PET/CT, and PET/MRI. There was relatively even distribution of papers studying primary vs. secondary malignancies, as well as utilizing 3-dimensional vs. 2-dimensional data. Many papers utilize custom built models as a modification or variation of U-Net. The most common metric for evaluation was the dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Most models achieved a DSC above 0.6, with medians for all imaging modalities between 0.85–0.9.DiscussionDeep learning methods show promising ability to segment malignant osseous lesions on CT, MRI, and PET/CT. Some strategies which are commonly applied to help improve performance include data augmentation, utilization of large public datasets, preprocessing including denoising and cropping, and U-Net architecture modification. Future directions include overcoming dataset and annotation homogeneity and generalizing for clinical applicability.

Keywords