Malaria Journal (Apr 2010)

Comparison of anaemia and parasitaemia as indicators of malaria control in household and EPI-health facility surveys in Malawi

  • Bronzan Rachel N,
  • Wolkon Adam,
  • Eng Jodi,
  • Campbell Carl H,
  • Mathanga Don P,
  • Malenga Grace J,
  • Ali Doreen,
  • Desai Meghna

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-107
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 1
p. 107

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The World Health Organization has recommended that anaemia be used as an additional indicator to monitor malaria burden at the community level as malaria interventions are nationally scaled up. To date, there are no published evaluations of this recommendation. Methods To evaluate this recommendation, a comparison of anaemia and parasitaemia among 6-30 month old children was made during two repeated cross-sectional household (HH) and health facility (HF) surveys in six districts across Malawi at baseline (2005) and in a follow-up survey (2008) after a scale up of malaria control interventions. Results HH net ownership did not increase between the years (50.5% vs. 49.8%), but insecticide treated net (ITN) ownership increased modestly from 41.5% (95% CI: 37.2%-45.8%) in 2005 to 45.3% (95% CI: 42.6%-48.0%) in 2008. ITN use by children 6-30 months old, who were living in HH with at least one net, increased from 73.6% (95% CI:68.2%-79.1%) to 80.0% (95% CI:75.9%-84.1%) over the three-year period. This modest increase in ITN use was associated with a decrease in moderate to severe anaemia (Hb Conclusion Increasing access to effective malaria prevention was associated with a reduced burden of malaria in young Malawian children. Anaemia measured at the HF level at time of routine vaccination may be a good surrogate indicator for its measurement at the HH level in evaluating national malaria control programmes.